December 1, 2005
Organizational and Employee Status Crucial to
Identified Workplace
by Sandie Taylor
A recent national survey revealed that eight of the top 10
challenges facing CEOs pertain to attracting, retaining and managing
talent. “People are increasingly seeing themselves as free agents,”
said Caroline Bartel, assistant professor in the Department of
Management at the McCombs School of Business. According to her
research, what people do is often more important than
where they do it. This makes it incredibly difficult for
companies to retain talented people.
In her talk for the Nov. 15 Faculty Research Presentation Series,
Bartel explained that much of a company’s success in retaining
employees is now based on how strongly workers identify with their
organization.
Identification, she said, is a situation where employees use the
company to help define who they are as individuals. “People who
identify strongly with a company tend to share the values, beliefs
and goals of the company,” Bartel added. And these employees are
more likely to stick around longer than those who don’t have this
same connection to the company.
To maintain that employee-company identification, Bartel said
employees need to believe that the corporation itself is of high
status and that they have also individually reached a certain status
within the organization.
“People identify more strongly with socially desirable
organizations,” she said. “This is most likely driven by a basic
need all individuals have for self-esteem.” For example, if the
company is doing a good deed or has a positive public image, some
employees see that as a reflection on themselves as well.
Bartel’s research looked into the myriad ways organizations gain or
lose status in the eyes of employees. She examined the effect four
community outreach projects had on 250 Pillsbury Co. employee
volunteers and found that the experience had status-enhancing
effects for the company. The experience led employees to see
favorable comparisons between their own company and the practices
and policies of other organizations, making Pillsbury more desirable
to them.
Allowing people to work outside of their normal environment and
experience “boundary-spanning roles,”—such as volunteering for a
non-profit or being encouraged to participate in a
corporate-sponsored community event—was a powerful way for companies
to help strengthen their status or image in the minds of their
employees.
“What’s different about boundary-spanning roles is that you’re out
there learning about other organizations and seeing the
differences,” she said. “This is more likely to be meaningful to you
and have more impact on you.”
In Bartel’s second field study of 381 recent hires at a global
organization that invents and manufactures information technologies,
she found that membership status—that is, employees feeling they are
respected and accepted in the company—leads to both stronger
identification with the company and a better work ethic.
Further, Bartel’s study showed that many employees experienced what
they perceived as low membership status at the company because they
worked from home and in other remote locales. The lack of daily
camaraderie and participation in office routines and practices made
them feel like outsiders amongst their peers who still worked at the
office.
Managers in this company remedied the situation by inviting
employees in on conference calls or to visit the department just to
hang out. These gestures demonstrated that although the employees
didn’t work on-site in the office, they were still respected and
accepted by the company.
In any situation where employees gain approval from managers or feel
like an integral part of the organization, those workers will likely
also feel better about themselves and their current career choices.
“Whether people believe that the corporation itself is of high
status or that they have reached a certain status within the
organization, those with increased identification with organization
put forth more effort on the job and were more cooperative,” she
noted. “They were more likely to reciprocate and give back.”
And according to Bartel, social status is a great tool for companies
to leverage. This is especially true for employees’ membership
status because unlike other resources, it is an unlimited resource
in organizations. “In theory, every member can have high status,”
she said.